Texan GOP Candidate: Violent Revolution Might Be Needed in US
In news from Texas, a Republican congressional candidate has told a local TV station that a violent revolution might be needed if Republicans do not win control of Congress in next month’s election. Stephen Broden, a Christian minister, made the remark in an interview with WFAA in Dallas.
Stephen Broden: “Our nation was founded on violence.”
Personally, I feel like none of those kids could have had it as bad as Turing did and even then, I wonder why he couldn’t just leave the UK and be gay and brilliant someplace else.
But this speaks to the ultimate stupidity of letting fear dictate your actions. If there had been a World War III, this man could have saved countless more lives. Hell, if he hadn’t killed himself in ‘54 he might have ushered in the modern age of computers decades earlier. Maybe he’d have invented the iPad.
Thanks to stupid, useless homophobia, we’ll never know.
But it’s not enough to just blame the homophobics out there.
It’s also our leaders that make no sense. How DADT or any kind of homophobia is tolerated in 21st Century America is testament to our shitty, shitty leaders who take a stand like they haven’t any legs.
Obama says bullying isn’t a right of passage—my ass it isn’t! Everyone gets bullied—but this is all beside the point. The real issue is irrational fear. Obama should speak out against irrational fear of ANYthing.
Gays, Muslims, terrorists—OH WAIT… some irrational fear Obama *wants* us to feel. :(
“It’s all about the truth, people. And all the evidence is crystal clear right now: the earth is far older than 6,000 years. Evolution is a real, and it is a process built on raw chance driven by the brutal engines of selection, and there is no sign of a loving, personal god, but only billions of years of pitiless winnowing without any direction other than short-term survival and reproduction. It’s not pretty, it’s not consoling, it doesn’t sanctify virginity, or tell you that god really loves your foreskin, but it’s got one soaring virtue that trumps all the others: it’s true.”
Dude, why are we still having this conversation? We’ve ALL been saying this shit for years! I’m sick of people telling me to go read stuff I already know. It’s just replacing one dogma with another. QUICK! GO READ THIS, IT SHALL REINFORCE EVERYTHING YOU BELIEVE!
Gee, thanks, but I’m already pretty firm in my point-of-view. I don’t need to read someone state the obvious.
And for God’s sake (!) stop using the word “selection” when referring to evolution. That suggests there’s a thought process behind things that happen. It’s not “the brutal engines of selection” it’s the brutal engines of FATE. There’s no being or even “unit” that “makes” a choice: “You get to live, YOU do not.”
It’s just random luck meeting random preparedness—fate.
It’s like when people call evolution a “process”. It isn’t. It may look like one because we line the evidence up in a nice easy-to-understand fashion. But the reality is that it’s not a process. It’s a mess of random events that cause things randomly. It’s not even “survival of the fittest,” it’s more “survival of the lucky.”
When we use words like “process” and “selection” we just give the believers room to wiggle and redefine what “truth” even means. That, in turn, allows them to keep preaching. And THAT, in turn, makes me want to walk away from the discussion, sit down and wait for the believers to die.
This is why I asked: why are we still having this discussion?
Secondly, however, I’d like to point out some bad reporting in the same article and after that I’ve got a question. Check out this cutting:
To hear the analysts who study them tell it, Japanese men ages 20 to 34 are staging the most curious of rebellions, rejecting the 70-hour workweeks and purchase-for-status ethos that typified the 1980s economic boom. As the latest class of college graduates struggles to find jobs, a growing number of experts are detecting a problem even broader than unemployment: They see a generation of men who don’t know what they want.
I emboldenededed that last bit for a reason I’ll get to in a second. So, wow—an entire generation are just fumbling around in the proverbial dark, clueless as to what they are doing or where they are heading. If that’s true, then don’t “the experts” answer the question I emboldenededed in that same paragraph? “The experts” say these guys are “rejecting the 70-hour workweeks” etc, etc. So, doesn’t it follow that they know exactly what they want? Less time at work, more time with people they care about and more personal fulfillment? I mean, who can blame them? Why work your life away for some company? Why ignore any potential dreams you may have, just some other guy can get rich?
At this point, I realized this scenario was starting to sound familiar. However, there was one more point in the article that said to me that maybe “the experts” and the person writing this article, weren’t connecting the fairly obvious dots as they should be. Here’s another cutting from much further on in the piece (important bit emboldenededed by me):
Japan’s dim economic climate, experts say, has spawned a generation of unsentimental job-seekers who see only a spectrum of flawed options.
So, there you go. There’s your answer. There’s no mystery here, Mr. or Ms. WaPo Reporter. It sounds like “the experts” know that, too. What’s more is how this scenario sounds all too familiar.
A “dim economic climate,” you say? “Job-seekers who see only a spectrum of flawed options,” huh? Dude, you just described America. You just described me.
Our way of life has crashed and burned around us. The Japanese have shared this with us for decades—their whole “salaryman” movement was just an analog to the “Me Generation,” here in the US, that idolized Gordon Gekko from the Oliver Stone movie “Wall Street”. So, it follows that we’re both seeing all of the same promises made to us by society broken.
“The lunatic fringe of the Republican Party, which looks set to make sweeping gains in the midterm elections, is the direct result of a collapse of liberalism. It is the product of bankrupt liberal institutions, including the press, the church, universities, labor unions, the arts and the Democratic Party. The legitimate rage being expressed by disenfranchised workers toward the college-educated liberal elite, who abetted or did nothing to halt the corporate assault on the poor and the working class of the last 30 years, is not misplaced. The liberal class is guilty. The liberal class, which continues to speak in the prim and obsolete language of policies and issues, refused to act. It failed to defend traditional liberal values during the long night of corporate assault in exchange for its position of privilege and comfort in the corporate state. The virulent right-wing backlash we now experience is an expression of the liberal class’ flagrant betrayal of the citizenry.”—
(No, but seriously, I’ve been writing about shit like this for ten years (though I do think calling the guilty “liberals” is a mistake—a more accurate name: “everyone”). I’m glad people are speaking out about this—real glad. I hope it’s a trend that continues!!)
666cast episode 30 from website666.com: In this episode I delve into some of the news stories from last week that poked me in the sensibilities. I hope that’s where they’ll poke you, too. Among the topics: Happy Creation Day, so what if gay IS a choice, the separation of church and gadget blog, China douchey with rare earth elements, cancer a modern invention, Juan Williams and his still-existing right to free-speech and MORE!
Most people don’t like it when I say this. It makes them angry. In the “era of colorblindness” there’s a nearly fanatical desire to cling to the myth that we as a nation have “moved beyond” race. Here are a few facts that run counter to that triumphant racial narrative:
Read the entire piece.
We are living in a police state, but it is one hundred times worse if you are black.
The net result of the drug wars has been to create a permanent undercaste — mostly young black men — disenfranchised, and unable to participate in a meaningful way in American society.
Yeah, the rest of that is stuff we’ve all heard before—the truth is, you don’t need to read it again because you already know that statistically our society is still absurdly racist. The important thing to read in that post, in my opinion, is Boyd’s own commentary:
We are living in a police state, but it is one hundred times worse if you are black.
The net result of the drug wars has been to create a permanent undercaste — mostly young black men — disenfranchised, and unable to participate in a meaningful way in American society.
I’ve emboldened the part I think is extra important. All you have to do is look at the statistics to know how much harder it is for blacks to make it in the world. Then again, it’s hard for *any* person born into poverty to be able to “participate in a meaningful way in American society.”
Until we can retool our society to *actually* make opportunities equally available for *all*, there will always be this dynamic. The symptom is institutionalized racism, but the disease is an unequal world for us all.
Holy cats, I don’t know how women deal with this! From the above linked MoJo article:
When my period hits, I usually snag the cheapest disposable product in the feminine hygiene aisle of my nearest Walgreen’s. But then I read on the Sierra Club’s website that the tampons and pads in my bathroom cabinet are not only clogging up US waterways and landfills, but they may also contain materials that could harm my body.
Slate's Green Lantern investigated the environmental impact of period supplies and found out that of the 62,415 pounds of total trash one US woman throws out doing her menstrual years, “pads, plugs, and applicators” only account for about 250 to 300 pounds of the garbage. Still, the individual plastic packaging on my pads isn’t exactly helping to decrease my personal landfill load. Same goes for the 16,800 tampons I’m expected to use in my lifetime, though the non-applicator kind are marginally less wasteful…
Sheesh. Here’s another problem the doesn’t seem to have much of an alternative. But hey, God gave us this planet to abuse, right? I just want to know what we’re supposed to do when we’re knee-deep in “plastic applicators”??
“Climate change is real, and man is causing it,” Mr. Hill said, echoing most climate scientists. “That is indisputable. And we have to do something about it.”
A rain of boos showered Mr. Hill, including a hearty growl from Norman Dennison, a 50-year-old electrician and founder of the Corydon Tea Party.
“It’s a flat-out lie,” Mr. Dennison said in an interview after the debate, adding that he had based his view on the preaching of Rush Limbaugh and the teaching of Scripture. “I read my Bible,” Mr. Dennison said. “He made this earth for us to utilize.”
Boyd then describes his take on the TPers as cherry picking their platform to meet their political needs. I’ve been trying to work on other projects but I had to leave a comment. Here’s what I said:
I’m having serious trouble keeping up with all the stuff worth blogging about—this is ridiculous! And the TPers are ridiculous. You make a good point regarding the TP platform being a grab bag of denial—next thing you know they’ll be applying for tax-free status as a new religion! >_<
And if Ms. Khuri is upset about “money-control avenues” maybe she should make a bigger deal about the Fed since it’s their *mission statement* to control our money.
And is it me or do none of their Global Warming Denials actually deny GW is actually happening? Saying God gave us this world to do what we want with it doesn’t mean we’re not trashing it. I’m an atheist, but what IF there is a God and He said the Earth is to do with as you please—what does the Bible say about dealing with rising sea levels? And changing weather patterns? Does it say in the Bible that God is a cosmic landlord in the sky who will fix our Central Air when it breaks down?
Whether GW and CC are man-made or not doesn’t matter to me. I just want to know what we can do to deal with the consequences. If “God” has an answer or the answer, let’s hear it already.
Of course, if the answer is “have faith in God” my answer to that is: “My name isn’t Job, tell me what to do about NYC’s Broadway becoming a waterway.”
I know every generation thinks things are going to hell in a handbasket, but it DOES feel warm in here, doesn’t it?
When I saw this post on TUAW, my first instinct was to just blow it off. Then I started reading the comments and realized that I wasn’t alone in finding it odd that software for such a niche was being blogged about. So, I decided to chime in. Here’s what I said in a comment:
Meh, I’m with the naysayers, let the Christian blogs cover Christian software. This blog already serves a specific niche. Though to be honest a Christian-themed post makes perfect sense on a fan blog for a company that loves to believe in their own version of reality, instead of *actual* reality.
All right, I’m done being douchey. I hope this post was civil enough for you.
That last part was referencing an earlier commenter who claimed to have had a comment removed. The author of the post explained away the removal of the comment as being a result of its lack of civility. I guess that makes it OK…?
Anyway, so the author of the post replied to my comment with:
Then should we let photography blogs cover the photography apps? Geek blogs cover Terminal tips? Writing sites cover writing apps? Where does it end? Why is Christian software a ‘niche’? Whether you are happy about it or not, there are quite a few Christians around.
Haha, are there? I hadn’t noticed them! (Why do you think I feel compelled to speak out in instances like this one?) And here’s what I replied with:
@TJLuoma, fair enough, but I don’t think photographers are linked to things like oppression, homophobia, child abuse and religious wars. But putting aside my personal feeling of offense when Christianity is mentioned, religion is a personal thing. Keep it to yourself and everything’s cool.
Besides, photography and technology overlap, thematically. Christianity and technology don’t. At least, not natively. Software being used as a study guide for Christian doctrine is hardly a natural fit. By your logic we should see TUAW cover apps that only plumbers would use. “Do you know how many plumbers there are in the world? And now they are using software compatible with Macs, so that makes it relevant to TUAW!”
I mean, hey, it’s not my blog, AOL can do what they want with it. This is just my ¥2.
Well, I tried to point out why Christian stuff shouldn’t show up on a tech blog, but if you’re willing to not see the difference between being responsible for untold oppression/torture/death and, say, photography, what’s an atheist boy to do?
“Tea baggers? Walmart? Warren Buffett? Get a life. Look no furthur than your mirror for the answer to today’s america. Also look around the world and see the people rising up in defense of their future. What kind of people lets the future of their children be stolen and do nothing? Maybe you can eat your cell phones and flat screens when food prices go off the cliff. Maybe your local sports bar will feed your family. Maybe the mall will give you shelter when you become homeless. Silence and indifference has wiped out america. but you don’t have time to worry about that right now, the holiday season is here. Shop til’ you drop…”—
A great sentiment and I agree with everything in it but only to a point—what about the responsibility of our leaders? We, The People, end up getting blamed for our problems because we don’t speak up and do something, but we elect leaders to represent us. We vote with our dollars to make sure companies we like are successful. Where are THEY in playing the “Take Responsibility Game” and why do we keep supporting them and letting them get away with not doing their part?
In a world where our leaders in government and business provide us with no positive examples to follow or learn from, how can we be blamed for our conditioned apathy?
It’s our leaders in government and business who have the resources to set a good example. They can afford to be heroes. But they’re not. And they blame us. And we blame ourselves.
I’m sick of being blamed for shit I didn’t do. I didn’t know my cell phone caused strife in Africa. I didn’t know the car I drove for 10 years would add a ton of pollutants to the atmosphere every year I drove it. However, when I found out, I did something about it. I sold my car. I switched to compact fluorescent bulbs, I made sure to recycle. I don’t own as many computers as I could. I do a host of other things that help reduce my impact on the world around me.
And you know what? None of it’s going to do any good because our leaders in government and business are still dropping the ball. They still fail to see that they are there for us—not the other way around. And since they are in control, there’s not much We, The People can do.
After oil, what do you think is the most important comodity? Okay, after money, what do you think the most important comodity is? It’s water. And in fact, since water is a basic neccessity of life itself, one would be inclined to believe that water is more important than oil or money. And water is a focal point of stress around the globe. For the US, it hits home when water treaties signed decades ago are said by US sources to be ignored by the Mexican government. In fact, things have gotten so heated that even foreign press has taken note.
At the web site for Scotland’s National newspaper, TheScotsman.co.uk, an article was posted on June 17, 2002 referring to the situation as a “Cold War over Water”. See, back in 1944 the US and Mexico signed this treaty that agreed that Mexico would pay 114 billion gallons of water to Texas a year by regulating dams on the Mexican side of the Rio Grande. However, Mexico is now over 500 billion gallons in debt and after a recent spigot opening on the Mexican side of the Falcon Lake Resevoir, over 11 billion gallons have been dispensed to Mexican farmers who have been dealing with a terrible drought for the better part of a decade. This angers Texan water officials and farmers because not only is Mexico failing to use that water to pay off their debt, but the water taken from Falcon Lake will ruin the fishing situation there and farmers off the Rio Grande will have a much harder time farming at a time when they too are dealing with the same drought affecting Mexican farmers.
This situation is only made worse by the fifth placement of the Rio Grande on the 10 most endangered US waterways list compiled by American Rivers, a Washington DC-based environmental group. They point out that the Rio Grande has gotten so thin that it lacks enough water to even make it to the Gulf of Mexico.
Either way, the water situation is a serious one and unless the mainstream media starts covering it, before we know it, we’ll be ill equiped to deal with a world where water is, in the short term, more important the money or oil.
Sometimes I wonder what planet I’m from because I just don’t get things other Earthlings claim. Some of what follows I agree with, but a most of them raise, not just red flags but, huge, fluorescent-colored WTF flags. I’ve emboldenededed, and added numbers for the ones I disagree with.
The rules of today’s journalistic world are these:
Knowing the story is not enough.
Telling the story is only the beginning.
The conversation about the story is as important as the story itself.
The more you try to be paternalistic and authoritative, the less people will believe you. (1)
The more you cede control to your audience, the more people will respect you (2)
The more you embrace new technology as a platform, the more your ideas will compete. (3)
The more you abandon the faceless and characterless, the more you can set the agenda (4)
The more you look beyond the story for connections, the more value you will have.
And if you have value and no one else does, you will get paid. (5)
But it is exciting and transforming. (6)
1) The more you try to be paternalistic and authoritative, the less people will believe you. Yeah, that Glenn Beck is going nowhere FAST!
2) The more you cede control to your audience, the more people will respect you Really? Is that why Rick Sanchez is loved my millions? Oh wait, he’s not. For giving an entire show over to Twitter, he made himself a joke. Aside from Sanchez, it’s pretty obvious that people like to be told what to do (see point 1). Giving control over to people only sounds good on paper—in reality, no one needs *more* options. We have too much to think about as it is. We need BETTER options—hence, the whole “going beyond the story” thing makes perfect sense to me.
3) The more you embrace new technology as a platform, the more your ideas will compete. This may or may not be true. I don’t see any obvious evidence of this. The porn industry is always fast to adopt new technology, but I’ve been hearing they’re suffering just as much as everyone else these days and I’m pretty sure you can’t accuse them of not embracing the Internet when it first started to go mainstream (unlike everyone else in mainstream media).
4) The more you abandon the faceless and characterless, the more you can set the agenda I don’t even know what this means. I see zero connection between being faceless and not being able to set the agenda. This is what I hate about lists like this—no context, little explanation (guys, see the first few points ON YOUR OWN LIST to know what I’m talking about).
5) And if you have value and no one else does, you will get paid. Uh-huh. So value is something easily recognized, is it? Is that why there are so many amazing films coming out of Hollywood every year? Is that why for decades TV had the unflattering nickname of “the boob tube”. I see very few truly valuable shows/movies/news reports being produced these days.
The problem is that we’ve got two different definitions of “value” here. The list claims “The more you look beyond the story for connections, the more value you will have.” which makes perfect sense—but ONLY if you’re defining a “valuable story” as a deep, well-researched story. The catch? That’s not the definition the business world uses. The business world wants sensational articles that will get people to buy magazines or click links. That’s the definition of “value” to business. So, there’s a disconnect here between what the list claims and what the reality is. It’s almost as though the person that wrote the list didn’t bother GOING BEYOND THE STORY. >_<
6) But it is exciting and transforming. Seriously? No it’s not. It’s how journalism should have always been done and the only reason it isn’t is because we’re all in it for a buck. Jeez-Lou-eez, guys? How does this stuff get reposted and quoted when it’s so obviously full of holes?
I mean, here’s a list of crap that journalists are supposed to do that is “exciting and transforming” and isn’t simple. Yet, it is pretty simple. So simple, the guy that wrote it couldn’t be bothered to follow the very rules he was laying down and THINK about some of his claims before speaking them aloud.
Just because you consider yourself a liberal or a progressive doesn’t make you any less responsible for your words. Just because you quote other liberals or progressives (or whatever they’re called) doesn’t mean they’re always right or that you don’t need to question everything they say—even if it sounds good to you (at first).
These “rules” are sadly just wishful thinking. Hell, they might be the real reason why newspapers are failing. Maybe we should reinvent journalism to the point where serious journalists get paid with our taxes.
Or, maybe, we consumers need to stop paying for such stupid shit in the first place.
Carbon pollution and over-use of Earth’s natural resources have become so critical that, on current trends, we will need a second planet to meet our needs by 2030, the WWF said on Wednesday.
In 2007, Earth’s 6.8 billion humans were living 50% beyond the planet’s threshold of sustainability, according to its report, issued ahead of a UN biodiversity conference. “Even with modest UN projections for population growth, consumption and climate change, by 2030 humanity will need the capacity of two Earths to absorb CO2; waste and keep up with natural resource consumption,” it warned.
If everyone used resources at the same rate per capita as the United States or the United Arab Emirates, four and a half planets would be needed, it said, highlighting the gap in “ecological footprint” between rich and poor.
The “Living Planet” report, the eighth in the series, is based on figures for 2007, the latest year for which figures are available. It pointed to 71 countries that were running down their sources of freshwater at a worrying, unsustainable rate. Nearly two-thirds of these countries experience “moderate to severe” water stress.
“This has profound implications for ecosystem health, food production and human wellbeing, and is likely to be exacerbated by climate change,” WWF said. Signatories to the UN’s Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) are to meet in Nagoya, Japan, from October 18-29 to discuss ways of addressing Earth’s dramatic loss of species.
UN members pledged to achieve by 2010 “a significant reduction” in the rate of wildlife loss. Biologists say many species, especially mammals, birds and amphibians, are in headlong decline, their numbers ravaged by habitat loss, hunting or the likely impact of climate change.
The World Wildlife Foundation says our planet will begin to run out of resources for us by 2030 and says we need to find another planet for ourselves—anybody wanna say no?
But wow—I never expected such a specific date to be available for when Road Warrior Times are to begin. I just figured I’d wake up one morning and discover that it’s socially acceptable to bash someone’s skull in for their gasoline.
Joking aside, can we please start spending serious money on the development of a Faster-Than-Light Drive NOW? We have a need and if we’re all adults, we can see that it is logical to start doing this since we know it will take a while to make it work.
Reblog this link to support our global campaign to stop Europe’s multiple attempts to restrict access to medicines for patients across the developing world.
Help us send a message to the European Commission to keep their HANDS OFF OUR MEDICINE!
Thanks for your support!
Yeah, I’m pretty much pro-humanity and anti-unregulated-corporate-power, so this hits me a couple different ways. Please reblog or RT or reFB or whatever—spread the word that untold lives are at risk because big pharma wants to control patents and the EU might let them.
Wall Street is set to witness a record rise in employee compensation for the second consecutive year, according to Wall Street Journal.
About 35 securities and investment firms are expected to pay $144 billion in compensation and benefits in 2010, up 4 percent from $139 billion in 2009, according to a survey, WSJ said. While compensation is set to rise at 26 firms, revenue increase may be seen in 29 of the 35 institutions, the survey showed.
It’s so nice that there’s no one who can stop all this from happening. It’s like we don’t mind our money being taken out of our pockets and put into the pockets of a comparative handful of people. >_<
I think I smell a candidate for effyou.org this week!
666cast episode 28 from website666.com: Part 2 of the “Fall of the American Empire” series, this time with special guest ranter—Stew—who happens to be one of my best and oldest friends in the universe.
Republican candidate for governor of New York, Carl P. Paladino, spoke to a gathering in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, that included Orthodox Jewish leaders as reported by the NYT:
“That’s not how God created us,” he said, reading from a prepared address.
“I just think my children and your children would be much better off and much more successful getting married and raising a family, and I don’t want them brainwashed into thinking that homosexuality is an equally valid and successful option — it isn’t.”
And then, to applause at Congregation Shaarei Chaim, he said: “I didn’t march in the gay parade this year — the gay pride parade this year. My opponent did, and that’s not the example we should be showing our children.” Newsday.com reported that Mr. Paladino’s prepared text had included the sentence: “There is nothing to be proud of in being a dysfunctional homosexual.” But Mr. Paladino omitted the sentence in his speech.
Americans have been forced to debate fraudulent issues.. Gay marriage, social issues.. we are blinded by anger that has no bearing on our lives.
This is something I’ve taken to calling “the Absurd Disconnect.” And sadly, I think even coalspeaker got hit with it in between writing these two posts. Bullying is like terrorism—it’s always been with us and it probably always will be with us. And just like the media took a handful of extremists and helped the government turn them into a war against our very way of life, the media is blowing this whole bullying thing completely out of proportion.
Should bullying be a crime? Of course NOT. The things we already designate as crimes are already more than enough to cover our bases. In fact, these things are too much since hate crimes are essentially punishment for wrongthinking. It shouldn’t matter why I kill someone. All that should matter is that I kill someone.
Likewise, you can’t arrest someone for being a horrible person unless he/she actually does something horrible (and illegal). And if picking on someone smaller than you is horrible then you better start arresting people in the US government and the US military and… you get the idea.
I believe firmly in a human right to choose to live or die on your own terms, but killing yourself because of what other people think? That seems pretty stupid to me.
Is it sad that a bunch of gay teens killed themselves? Of course. Is the bullying they experienced wrong, unfair and mean? OF COURSE. But were these kids ultimately responsible for their own choice to end their lives? Yes.
You’ll never make everyone happy—there will always be someone out there who hates you vindictively, whether he’s a bully or a Taliban. The smarter thing to do is just live your life as best as you know how and let the hard times make you stronger and smarter.
And does ANY of this have any bearing on saving our way of life?
At issue was whether Congress could require Americans to purchase a commercial product like health insurance under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause, the New York Times reports. Since the decision not to purchase health insurance would affect interstate commerce, U.S. District Judge George Steeh ruled, Congress can lawfully require the purchase.
Say, WHAT? Why am *I* responsible for affecting interstate commerce by NOT doing something? This seriously makes no sense. By not smoking, aren’t I affecting interstate commerce? Since I don’t smoke, there is less demand for cigarettes which means interstate commerce slows, right?
I read the NYT article linked to above and that doesn’t do much to make the judge’s decision more logical.
Essentially, he’s pulling from his ass this idea that if I choose to not get insurance, I’m going to stick those who do with the bill. I don’t see how that works.
I am morally against the health insurance industry. I think an industry that makes money off of others’ suffering is wrong. I want a public option and will refuse to pay for health care through an insurance company if I can help it.
But that’s bullshit—you really think 500 million Facebook accounts equates to 500 million people salivating/fawning/ogling/devouring every thing that Mark Zuckerberg squeezes out? How many people have FB accounts but do nothing with them? I have three and barely touch them. How many other people out there are the same?
I’m calling douchery until Zuckerberg grows a spine and tells us how many ACTIVE Facebook users there are.
I’m pretty sure the number will still be plenty impressive, but I’m sick of everyone just accepting what so many people say in the media. Brain-up, kids. 90% of what we hear is hype—aka bullshit—and should not be trusted. Zuckerdouche has a vested interest in making us think he’s the shit. When really, we should not be so trusting.
The world’s two great ice sheets are melting faster than anyone believed possible
I’m so glad I live on a hill. Of course, I also live on an island, so maybe I should start saving up for a kayak that I can take down Broadway and save money on subway fare, which will undoubtedly go up since they’ll have to pay to make the subway system water-tight. Aw, hell—I’ll just buy a houseboat.
But seriously, this kind of thing is exactly what scares me. Over the past decade, the human race (or those in charge of it) have shown a high level of incompetence. Even the people who are supposed to be smart (ie scientists) are not just cutting to the chase and telling us that things may very well be MUCH worse than we can tell right away. The trend is obviously leaning toward “worse” despite the lack of observable evidence beforehand. Unlike the smoking gun/mushroom cloud metaphor the Bush 43 Administration used to con many Americans into believing Iraq had WMD, there is MUCH more science behind being alarmist now.
On top of that, most of our scientists’ estimates have been conservative—and shown to ultimately be wrong (as the above article shows). So, do we wait until they’re wrong about something with huge and immediate consequences?
Better safe than sorry, I say. Plus, since we’ll all benefit from reacting to this threat even if it’s not a real threat, this is a much better thing to overreact to.
It’s just a shame we’re all too timid.
Sometimes I feel like the smartest frog in the pot of slowly warming water…