Tweet
thepete
on Sunday, October 16th at
11:48 AM. [link]
tags: atheism god godzilla
Available in higher resolution.
|
Tweet
Meta-post information follows:
Found via
friendlyatheist
on Sunday, October 16th at
11:48 AM. [link]
tags: atheism god godzilla Available in higher resolution. Tweet
It’s hard to do it because you gotta look people in the eye and tell ‘em they’re irresponsible and lazy. And who’s gonna wanna do that? Because that’s what poverty is, ladies and gentlemen. In this country, you can succeed if you get educated and work hard. Period. Period.
It’s opinions and attitudes like O’Reilly’s that will raise the collective temperature of the lower class to a boiling point. History shows us that poor people, if pushed, will turn to violence to quench their thirst for “justice” or “fairness” when, really it will be about jealousy and revenge. But what you call it won’t matter. Back during the late 1800s and early 1900s, rich people’s homes were sacked in cities like New York. Rich people hired guards to make sure no one would burn their homes down. See—they weren’t common thieves—they wanted revenge and it’ll happen again, just like back then (read Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States” for more on this—it’s a brilliant history book as it is told from the loser’s point-of-view). But the thing is, the attitude of the rich isn’t entirely inaccurate—if you work hard you are more likely to do well. After all, success is when preparation meets opportunity. So the rich are right in this way. Of course, they don’t talk about the lack of opportunities. Also, just because the rich are partially right doesn’t give them license to be douchebags about it. And the bigger the douchebag they are, the more anxious the “unprivileged” will be to pop that bag and shower in that vinegar and water goodness (sorry, metaphor went off the rails there). Now, when the rich get all uppity about “class warfare” they’re just Orwellian-style doublespeaking. In other words, when rich people talk of “class warfare” they’re doing it to distract us from noticing that they, themselves are committing acts of class war. When a rich person says to a jobless, homeless or penniless person (JHP), “work hard and you will succeed!” that is class warfare. The rich person is withholding all aid and resources from this “JHP” person. Now consider what you do to your enemy in a time of war: you cut off their resources. Therefore cutting funding to social programs, health programs, libraries and education is literally class warfare. It’s wonderful since they get mad when they’re accused of class warfare, but they don’t have a problem accusing everyone else. And capitalism is JUST like God, as one of the rebloggers above said. And it’s just as impossible to have a rational conversation with someone who has an irrational belief in something. The system is failing us—and it will continue to fail us because of this absurd faith in the magical properties of capitalism. So, until something dramatically changes, the system will continue to fall apart because the people in charge are just ignoring the problems, even denying they exist—as though belief is enough. They’re like economic Christian Scientists. Idiots. (Source: brainyquote.com)
Meta-post information follows:
Found via
simplyopinions
on Sunday, October 9th at
7:51 PM. [link]
tags: fox news politics economy economics capitalism God belief Class Warfare Tweet
When’s the last time you were offended?
“You have adults going, “I was offended! I was offended!” Well, so what? Be offended! Nothing happens! You’re an adult, grow up, deal with it. “But I was offended!” I don’t care! Nothing happens when you’re offended. It’s not like, “I went to a comedy show, and the comedian said something about the Lord, and I was offended, and when I woke up in the morning, I had leprosy!” Nothing happens. “I want to live in a democracy, but I never want to be offended again!” Well, you’re an idiot.” I get around this by understanding people are allowed their own views and so long as said views don’t effect me, I don’t care. So if I see a show or a comic that offends me, I walk out. That’s it. If they’re preaching hate or violence, I might send them a nasty email or post something nasty about them on my blog. But that’s it. I’ve got better things to do than waste time being offended. Which reminds me, I’ve got better things to do that belaboring this point. :)
Meta-post information follows:
Found via
thereisnogod
on Sunday, October 9th at
4:27 PM. [link]
tags: democracy god humour offense religion steve hughes truth freedom rights Tweet
![]() I agree with the sentiment of this “Words that Christians Misuse” but I think this graphic utterly full of crap. “Study” saying what they really do at “Bible Study” is really “Bible Worship” is semantics. Most people who study something usually revere that thing or else they wouldn’t be studying it. You might as well call Neil deGrasse Tyson a “Science Worshipper” (and you’d be accurate). “Truth” this is NOT the “conformity with fact or reality.” I’m not sure where this definition even comes from. Merriam-Webster defines truth as the following (important part emboldened/italicized by me): a archaic : fidelity, constancyb : sincerity in action, character, and utterance 2a (1) : the state of being the case : fact (2) : the body of real things, events, and facts : actuality (3) often capitalized: a transcendent fundamental or spiritual reality b : a judgment, proposition, or idea that is true or accepted as true <truths of thermodynamics >c : the body of true statements and propositions3a : the property (as of a statement) of being in accord with fact or reality b chiefly British : true 2c : fidelity to an original or to a standard 4capitalized Christian Science : god— in truth: in accordance with fact : actually So, in other words, one of the official definitions of the truth fits pretty much with the way Christians use it. Sad that language, itself, seems to be biased toward religion. But again, Christians aren’t really misusing the word “truth.” “Morality” is NOT what causes the least amount of harm to others. That’s the most absurd definition of “morality” I’ve ever read. Morality is doing what is right (though it’s definition is more involved than just that). Sometimes we define “right” as doing more harm for the greater good. Like going to war, or killing in self-defense, or euthanasia. Morality is a big fat gray zone of debate since so often the very definition of what is “right” changes based on one’s mood. So, if you believe what God says is right and someone tells you God said that it’s OK to slaughter the Canaanites, then wiping out all of the people of Canaan is a moral thing to do. “Freewill” is not a word. Well, not a noun, anyway. It’s an adjective. It means “voluntary” or, oddly, “spontaneous”. What Christians say God gave us is “Free Will”. In other words, the ability to be free with our will. Of all the problems I have with religion, I think this is the part I have the least trouble with. But the above graphic says “In the Bible God only gave us the ability to choose what we want to do (will), but not the freedom to act upon those choices.” This makes no sense. The Bible says we are free to exercise our will. Which part of “free will” stops you from “acting upon those choices”? The reality, for both Believers and non-believers, is that there are consequences to your actions. Christianity dreams up all sorts of scary shit to keep Believers in line, but there’s nothing in Christianity that forces Believers to be a certain way—they just scare you into it. That’s still free will since it is your choice to do something that will result in punishment. “Adultery” does not mean “having sex with a person who is married to another.” I’ll paraphrase the correct definition and say that adultery is having sex with someone other than one’s spouse. As for the part where Jesus says adultery and lust are the same thing, I think, from a certain point of view, that’s an accurate statement. The idea is to keep all of your love for your spouse and when you feel amorous toward someone who isn’t your spouse without acting on those feelings, in a way, you’re cheating. Of course, you’re also giving into your genetics, which aren’t really programmed for monogamy, so whatever. “Love” is the second of two words that is properly defined by this graphic. Though it is incomplete. The complete definition is “strong affection for another arising out of kinship or personal ties.” It is standard Christian propaganda to say that God has a personal relationship with all of us and that “He” “loves” us. This is obviously not true since there is no God. However, this is not an example of Christians misusing words. They say that “God is love” because they are good at marketing. Wow, I’m really starting to wonder about my fellow atheists. When you make up a whole graphic that claims to describe how Christians misuse certain words, you might want to consult a dictionary, first. Seriously, this stupid graphic is one of the most moronic things I’ve read in weeks—and I’ve been reading a lot about Rick Perry, so that’s saying something! Tweet
While I didn’t hear in there the specific accusation that Obama is the anti-Christ, I’d like to just come out and say it: I’m anti-Christ. …But I’m not THE anti-Christ. I feel that while some of his alleged teachings sound great, I think you’d be better off reading the words of Superman or Spider-Man to look for wisdom. They’re just as reality-based as Jesus, in fact, I think modern super-heroes are more relavant than some ancient super-hero who fictionally lived 2000 years ago. It’s sort of like when people tell me I’m going to go to hell or that I won’t get into heaven both because I’m an atheist. I usually respond “Ok, I guess.” “But aren’t you afraid?” “Um, of something that doesn’t appear to exist? No.”
Meta-post information follows:
Found via
thereisnogod
on Tuesday, September 27th at
6:15 PM. [link]
tags: Obama Antichrist Christian religion politics Jesus Christ God Bible Preisdent Obama Tweet
How I see the universe and how I (don’t) see God (at all).
A week or two ago, I stumbled across a post somewhere on some blog that featured a TED video of a pastor/minister/priest/somethingorother giving a talk about how God can let terrible tragedy happen. I won’t go into my honest surprise at seeing God being the topic of a TED video. I wasn’t about to watch the thing, but I did glance over a bit of what the guy who posted the video had to say. As with all believers, I’m puzzled as to why people have this seemingly impossible-to-deny desire to believe in a supreme being. The video was apparently about how silly it is that most believers agree that God is infinite and yet they’ve also decided that God is “this” or “that.” Yes, it is silly. But what about the part where you accept that God is infinite right along the idea that God can ever be comprehended or understood in the first place? Why even bother trying to comprehend him if you know the human brain can never fully do it? And since He is just so far above you, why do you even bother believing at all? What’s the point? I left some of that in a comment on the already commented upon post (most of the comments were from believers). And I did get a response from the original poster explaining that we should try to understand God so we can understand existence, understand how we understand and understand how we relate to each other. Being careful to only slightly stretch my own 3 Rules of Internet Arguing, I decided to leave one more comment. Here it is:
To me, there can’t really be meaning without anyone around the comprehend that meaning. If meaning was so important to God, you’d think that He’d create a universe teaming with life forms—plenty of people to understand the meaning He has created. Instead, we are the only ones. We are the only ones who see the patterns. We see star systems and galaxies and shapes and beauty. We bring the meaning. Not God. We see the stunning mechanics of the universe, while the universe itself, sees nothing. And that’s OK with me. Tweet
“It’s all about the truth, people.” Haha, easy for you to say…
From friendlyatheist: “It’s all about the truth, people. And all the evidence is crystal clear right now: the earth is far older than 6,000 years. Evolution is a real, and it is a process built on raw chance driven by the brutal engines of selection, and there is no sign of a loving, personal god, but only billions of years of pitiless winnowing without any direction other than short-term survival and reproduction. It’s not pretty, it’s not consoling, it doesn’t sanctify virginity, or tell you that god really loves your foreskin, but it’s got one soaring virtue that trumps all the others: it’s true.” YES! GO READ IT NOW! I COMMAND IT! Dude, why are we still having this conversation? We’ve ALL been saying this shit for years! I’m sick of people telling me to go read stuff I already know. It’s just replacing one dogma with another. QUICK! GO READ THIS, IT SHALL REINFORCE EVERYTHING YOU BELIEVE! Gee, thanks, but I’m already pretty firm in my point-of-view. I don’t need to read someone state the obvious. And for God’s sake (!) stop using the word “selection” when referring to evolution. That suggests there’s a thought process behind things that happen. It’s not “the brutal engines of selection” it’s the brutal engines of FATE. There’s no being or even “unit” that “makes” a choice: “You get to live, YOU do not.” It’s just random luck meeting random preparedness—fate. It’s like when people call evolution a “process”. It isn’t. It may look like one because we line the evidence up in a nice easy-to-understand fashion. But the reality is that it’s not a process. It’s a mess of random events that cause things randomly. It’s not even “survival of the fittest,” it’s more “survival of the lucky.” When we use words like “process” and “selection” we just give the believers room to wiggle and redefine what “truth” even means. That, in turn, allows them to keep preaching. And THAT, in turn, makes me want to walk away from the discussion, sit down and wait for the believers to die. This is why I asked: why are we still having this discussion?
Meta-post information follows:
Found via
friendlyatheist
on Tuesday, October 26th at
3:51 PM. [link]
tags: truth religion God evolution survival of the fittest dogma Tweet
THAT’S how bedbugs procreate? So, uh, what’s up with that, God?
Don’t let the bedbugs bite? That’s not the only thing we want to stop them from doing! So, I saw this post and thought it provided a nice example of an argument I’ve been making for years: “Another Resons To Avoid Bedbugs: Traumatic Insemination” from underpaidgenius:
That last comment there is from Stowe Boyd, the “Underpaid Genius” behind UnderpaidGenius.com. I agree with him—but hey, God works in mysterious ways, right? The thing is, this isn’t just mysterious—this is downright fucked up. I remember the exact moment I became an atheist. I was about 12 and was in Sunday School. My teacher was telling us how God was “all around us.” I thought about that for a moment and then pointed to the middle of the table I was sitting at and asked “God is there? In the middle of this table?” “Yes, of course!” replied the teacher. “But that’s stupid,” I said. But God being in the middle of a table is just the tip of the “stupid” iceberg. Look at how bedbugs reproduce for Christ’s sake ;) Their males have sword penises that wound their mates with sperm. And check it out homophobes! There are GAY BEDBUGS, TOO! So much for homosexuality being “unnatural,” but I digress… The point is, there are too many seriously twisted things in nature that are just too illogical and, frankly, messed up, to think a “just” god would allow them to occur. So, rather than give the female bedbug a nice, identifiable orifice for sex, it gives the male a stabbing tool for a penis. WHAT A DICK—and I’m not talking about a male bedbug’s reproductive organs. Why is God a dick? “Because He works in mysterious ways.” Orrrrr, God doesn’t exist and the “process” of evolution, the hit-and-miss style of life’s random attempts to work, yields some pretty bizarre results. What’s both scary and heartening is that the “evolution” argument seems much more rational and suggests the universe is much more stable than the “God” argument. According to believers, if I piss off God I could end up with cancer or dead. I’ll try my chances with random fate, thanks. Just keep those fucking bedbugs away from me, though—those things are MESSED UP.
Meta-post information follows:
Tweet
Who needs God? Not the Universe, says one of the smartest people on Earth (Stephen Hawking)
“Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing,” Hawking and his co-author, Caltech physicist Leonard Mlodinow, write in “The Grand Design,” which is due to be issued next week. “Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going.” Wow! The universe and I have a lot in common! Neither of us need God! It’s like we think alike, the universe and me!! I bet we’d get along really well! I wish the universe would come by my apartment once in a while. We’d have a blast!! Er, a bang! Wait, I don’t want to have sex with the universe!
Meta-post information follows:
Found via
friendlyatheist
on Thursday, September 2nd at
8:59 PM. [link]
tags: Stephen Hawking God atheism God isn't needed so deal with it. Tweet
Hey, All You Believers, Maybe This is God Sending Us a Message?
Found via underpaidgenius:
As an atheist, I hate to even play along that there might be a god, but since so very much is at stake, I’ll do it this once: < believe > HEY, LOOK AT ALL OF THESE OIL MISHAPS! CLEARLY, IT’S THE ALMIGHTY GOD TELLING US TO GET OFF THE OIL! All the evidence is there. All you need to do is Accept His Will and get off the oil. What’s your problem? YOU’LL GO TO HELL IF YOU DON’T SUPPORT ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND FIGHT GLOBAL WARMING!! JUST LOOK AT THE SIGNS, IGNORE THEM AND YOU ARE A DENIER OF GOD’S WILL!! Look, in a moment of weakness, I, an atheist, prayed to God and asked Him: “God, do you want us to get off oil or not?” THEN ALL OF THESE SPILLS HAPPENED.
OIL=SATAN THAT IS ALL. < /Believe > This had better work—I even learned of enough of their language to converse with them and everything!
Meta-post information follows:
Found via
underpaidgenius
on Tuesday, August 3rd at
12:14 AM. [link]
tags: Messages from God God Oil oil spills alternative energy OIL=SATAN THAT IS ALL. |
Leave a message at 740 297 6661 and get on the 666cast
About: The idea is that all of human society is based on a power structure that enslaves the trusting/ignorant and rewards the greedy and the dishonest. From government, to business to our individual lives, all of our actions are tailored to further support a system that exploits all of us and wastes our lives in the process. Website666.com endeavors to explain how. Shape-shifting lizards aren't running the world, but they might as well be. Only a sociopath would think they deserve to run things.
-ThePete,
|