Posted by thepete on Sunday, October 9th at 7:51 PM. [link]

It’s hard to do it because you gotta look people in the eye and tell ‘em they’re irresponsible and lazy. And who’s gonna wanna do that? Because that’s what poverty is, ladies and gentlemen. In this country, you can succeed if you get educated and work hard. Period. Period.

Bill “Poverty is a lack of hard work” O’Reilly, for Fox News

(via reallyfoxnews)

When are people going to realize how ignorant this statement is? Social mobility is becoming more and more limited each day, and poverty has nothing to do with hard work. It is blatantly obvious that,

1. Bill O’Reilly has never had a service job in his life

2. inherited wealth, and 

3. has never studied sociological theory or any sociology related topic in his life, or else he might actually understand the concepts of social mobility and oppression/greed.

(via killtvmakestuff)

I wonder how many of his fans he just called “irresponsible and lazy” in this?

(via feministslut)

A guy who gets paid millions for working an hour a day gets to call full-time minimum-wage workers irresponsible and lazy?

[animated image: Judge Judy sits in her courtroom in front of an American flag and New York state flag. She glances to towards the right side of the image and gives an incredulous smirk.]

(via afunnyfeminist)

The 99% posters I see MOSTLY complain about this lie.  This piece of shit we all get fed that “getting educated” will put us on the path to success.  Now we all took out student loans to pay hyper-inflated tuition prices for bullshit degrees that don’t matter when there are NO JOBS you can put that degree to work with.

of course he’s insulting his fans and dissenters alike, but the difference is his fans will agree with him.  They’re the 53%-ers, the ones who think it’s okay to work 100 hours a week to make ends meet.  Because they believe this bullshit myth of “hard work.” 

Newsflash: The people telling us we just have to “work hard” have no fucking idea what that really even means.  It’s just like being told you didn’t pray hard enough for something to come.  If you’re provided for, you’re working hard enough, whether that means broadcasting one hour a day on television or working 100 hours a week with no benefits.  If you’re not provided for, then you’re not working hard enough.  Even if you’re working 110 hours a week.  

Just like God can’t lose, Capitalism can’t lose either.  Corporations can’t lose.  It’s not their fault when the economy collapses, it’s not their fault when they don’t create any jobs for people to “work hard” at.  It IS their doing when things are going well, though.

(via sonic-hip-attack)

Fuck this fucktard. Poverty is not a lack of hard work. It’s a lack of luck. Fuck you rich people and fuck you Bill O’Reilly.

(via simplyopinions)

It’s opinions and attitudes like O’Reilly’s that will raise the collective temperature of the lower class to a boiling point.  History shows us that poor people, if pushed, will turn to violence to quench their thirst for “justice” or “fairness” when, really it will be about jealousy and revenge.  But what you call it won’t matter.  Back during the late 1800s and early 1900s, rich people’s homes were sacked in cities like New York.  Rich people hired guards to make sure no one would burn their homes down.  See—they weren’t common thieves—they wanted revenge and it’ll happen again, just like back then (read Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States” for more on this—it’s a brilliant history book as it is told from the loser’s point-of-view).

But the thing is, the attitude of the rich isn’t entirely inaccurate—if you work hard you are more likely to do well.  After all, success is when preparation meets opportunity.  So the rich are right in this way.  Of course, they don’t talk about the lack of opportunities. Also, just because the rich are partially right doesn’t give them license to be douchebags about it.  And the bigger the douchebag they are, the more anxious the “unprivileged” will be to pop that bag and shower in that vinegar and water goodness (sorry, metaphor went off the rails there).

Now, when the rich get all uppity about “class warfare” they’re just Orwellian-style doublespeaking.  In other words, when rich people talk of “class warfare” they’re doing it to distract us from noticing that they, themselves are committing acts of class war.

When a rich person says to a jobless, homeless or penniless person (JHP), “work hard and you will succeed!” that is class warfare.  The rich person is withholding all aid and resources from this “JHP” person.  Now consider what you do to your enemy in a time of war: you cut off their resources.

Therefore cutting funding to social programs, health programs, libraries and education is literally class warfare.  It’s wonderful since they get mad when they’re accused of class warfare, but they don’t have a problem accusing everyone else.

And capitalism is JUST like God, as one of the rebloggers above said.  And it’s just as impossible to have a rational conversation with someone who has an irrational belief in something.  

The system is failing us—and it will continue to fail us because of this absurd faith in the magical properties of capitalism.  So, until something dramatically changes, the system will continue to fall apart because the people in charge are just ignoring the problems, even denying they exist—as though belief is enough.  They’re like economic Christian Scientists.

Idiots.

(Source: brainyquote.com)


Posted by thepete on Wednesday, October 5th at 5:59 PM. [link]

motherjones:

cognitivedissonance:

Michelle Malkin makes the claim that Occupy Wall Street is 99% white. It hurts my irony bone for someone on Fox News to criticize a social movement for being “99% white.” It hurts real bad.
According to Malkin:

“The protesters have taken to calling themselves the ‘99 percent’ in the country, labeling the capitalists they wish to remove from power the other ‘1 percent.’ When Occupy Wall Street activists call themselves the ‘99 percent,’ it turns out they mean 99 percent non-diverse (by their own politically correct measurements). It’s as pale out there at Camp Alinsky as MSNBC’s prime-time lineup or the New York Times editorial board. Not counting the cameos by Jesse Jackson and Cornel West, that is.”

Uh-huh… love the photo choice showing a rather diverse crowd, Fox Nation. I don’t need to debunk your claim since you, um, did it yourselves.
Bravo.

h/t to Media Matters

 Oh, Malkin, you race-baiting fact-mangler, you.

Just turn OFF the GOD DAMN TV, ALREADY.

motherjones:

cognitivedissonance:

Michelle Malkin makes the claim that Occupy Wall Street is 99% white. It hurts my irony bone for someone on Fox News to criticize a social movement for being “99% white.” It hurts real bad.

According to Malkin:

“The protesters have taken to calling themselves the ‘99 percent’ in the country, labeling the capitalists they wish to remove from power the other ‘1 percent.’ When Occupy Wall Street activists call themselves the ‘99 percent,’ it turns out they mean 99 percent non-diverse (by their own politically correct measurements). It’s as pale out there at Camp Alinsky as MSNBC’s prime-time lineup or the New York Times editorial board. Not counting the cameos by Jesse Jackson and Cornel West, that is.”

Uh-huh… love the photo choice showing a rather diverse crowd, Fox Nation. I don’t need to debunk your claim since you, um, did it yourselves.

Bravo.

h/t to Media Matters

 Oh, Malkin, you race-baiting fact-mangler, you.

Just turn OFF the GOD DAMN TV, ALREADY.


Posted by thepete on Friday, August 19th at 1:59 AM. [link]

stfuhatemongers:

reallyfoxnews:

inothernews:

This is one of just a few onscreen graphics that Fox “News” actually put on the air.
I remember some asshole on here going on about how I was declaring “class warfare” because I thought things like universal healthcare were good things, things that would benefit our fellow men and women who — numbering in the tens of millions — go without such things.
So what the fuck is this, exactly?  What is Fox “News” trying to prove here?  That poor people aren’t actually “poor” because they have something in their homes that prevents essential foodstuffs like milk and eggs from spoiling?
That having things like a TV or a cellphone makes them, in words ACTUALLY USED ON FOX “NEWS” TO DEFINE POOR PEOPLE, “the takers,” “parasites” and “the moocher class”?
That a family of four making less than $23,000 a year is somehow getting away with something by literally being too poor to be taxed by the federal government?
Go fuck yourselves.
No seriously.  Go fuck yourselves right now.

^ commentary.

My fridge broke and all of my food spoiled (immediately after buying groceries). I bought a used one for cheap. 
You mad Fox News?

Maybe you thought Muslims were going to be the new scapegoats? The new illegal immigrants? The new Soviet threat or the new Jews to Nazi Germany?  Think again, it’s the “Have-Nots.”  See, when the X-Box riots begin over here in the US, like they did in the UK recently, the rich won’t have a problem sending the military in to stomp out the rioters because they’re already scum of the Earth that don’t deserve refrigerators.
Seriously, this is what the media does when they’re preparing us for something bad.  Before the Abu Ghraib story broke there were anchors on Fox News asking “why can’t we just beat the answers out of these guys we’re picking up?”

stfuhatemongers:

reallyfoxnews:

inothernews:

This is one of just a few onscreen graphics that Fox “News” actually put on the air.

I remember some asshole on here going on about how I was declaring “class warfare” because I thought things like universal healthcare were good things, things that would benefit our fellow men and women who — numbering in the tens of millions — go without such things.

So what the fuck is this, exactly?  What is Fox “News” trying to prove here?  That poor people aren’t actually “poor” because they have something in their homes that prevents essential foodstuffs like milk and eggs from spoiling?

That having things like a TV or a cellphone makes them, in words ACTUALLY USED ON FOX “NEWS” TO DEFINE POOR PEOPLE, “the takers,” “parasites” and “the moocher class”?

That a family of four making less than $23,000 a year is somehow getting away with something by literally being too poor to be taxed by the federal government?

Go fuck yourselves.

No seriously.  Go fuck yourselves right now.

^ commentary.

My fridge broke and all of my food spoiled (immediately after buying groceries). I bought a used one for cheap. 

You mad Fox News?

Maybe you thought Muslims were going to be the new scapegoats? The new illegal immigrants? The new Soviet threat or the new Jews to Nazi Germany?  Think again, it’s the “Have-Nots.”  See, when the X-Box riots begin over here in the US, like they did in the UK recently, the rich won’t have a problem sending the military in to stomp out the rioters because they’re already scum of the Earth that don’t deserve refrigerators.

Seriously, this is what the media does when they’re preparing us for something bad.  Before the Abu Ghraib story broke there were anchors on Fox News asking “why can’t we just beat the answers out of these guys we’re picking up?”


Posted by thepete on Friday, December 24th at 12:15 PM. [link]

“Fox News Announces Winner of the Holocaust”

Siskita found this on the Daily Show blog:

December 22 at 11:53AM by Dennis DiClaudio

Fox News Announces Winner of the Holocaust

Hey, it’s been a little more than 60 years, but they finally finished tallying up all the points from that war that they had over there in the whole world, and Fox News is proud to announce the grand champion of the Holocaust

Congratulations, Elie Wiesel! All your hard work has obviously not gone to waste.

While I know who Wiesel is and what he is a hero for doing, I actually respect him a little less for going on Fox News in the first place.  I think we should start boycotting people who go on Fox News. Clearly, they have a problem with their judgment skills.

I mean, seriously Fox News, “Holocaust Winner”?  Did he win a holocaust in a contest? Or did he win the holocaust, as in, he came out of it the winner? Or…WTF?


Posted by thepete on Friday, July 23rd at 12:56 AM. [link]

Why Glenn Beck should shut the fuck up about Tom Paine (hint: he felt all churches existed to enslave.)

contrararian:

“I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church. All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit. I do not mean by this declaration to condemn those who believe otherwise; they have the same right to their belief as I have to mine. But it is necessary to the happiness of man, that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.”

Thomas Paine, Glenn Beck’s crush (via mohandasgandhi) (via savagemike) (via danielholter)


Leave a message at
740 297 6661
and get on the 666cast
About:

The idea is that all of human society is based on a power structure that enslaves the trusting/ignorant and rewards the greedy and the dishonest. From government, to business to our individual lives, all of our actions are tailored to further support a system that exploits all of us and wastes our lives in the process. Website666.com endeavors to explain how. Shape-shifting lizards aren't running the world, but they might as well be. Only a sociopath would think they deserve to run things.

-ThePete,
webmaster website666.com,
effyou.org, dntlk.com, and thepete.com