Posted by thepete on Saturday, October 8th at 3:37 PM. [link]

I agree with the sentiment of this “Words that Christians Misuse” but I think this graphic utterly full of crap.
“Study” saying what they really do at “Bible Study” is really “Bible Worship” is semantics. Most people who study something usually revere that thing or else they wouldn’t be studying it.  You might as well call Neil deGrasse Tyson a “Science Worshipper” (and you’d be accurate).
“Truth” this is NOT the “conformity with fact or reality.”  I’m not sure where this definition even comes from.  Merriam-Webster defines truth as the following (important part emboldened/italicized by me):
a archaic : fidelity, constancyb : sincerity in action, character, and utterance 2a (1) : the state of being the case : fact (2) : the body of real things, events, and facts : actuality (3) often capitalized: a transcendent fundamental or spiritual reality b : a judgment, proposition, or idea that is true or accepted as true <truths of thermodynamics >c : the body of true statements and propositions3a : the property (as of a statement) of being in accord with fact or reality b chiefly British : true 2c : fidelity to an original or to a standard 4capitalized Christian Science : god— in truth: in accordance with fact : actually
So, in other words, one of the official definitions of the truth fits pretty much with the way Christians use it.  Sad that language, itself, seems to be biased toward religion.  But again, Christians aren’t really misusing the word “truth.”
“Morality” is NOT what causes the least amount of harm to others.  That’s the most absurd definition of “morality” I’ve ever read.  Morality is doing what is right (though it’s definition is more involved than just that). Sometimes we define “right” as doing more harm for the greater good.  Like going to war, or killing in self-defense, or euthanasia.  Morality is a big fat gray zone of debate since so often the very definition of what is “right” changes based on one’s mood.  So, if you believe what God says is right and someone tells you God said that it’s OK to slaughter the Canaanites, then wiping out all of the people of Canaan is a moral thing to do.
“Freewill” is not a word.  Well, not a noun, anyway.  It’s an adjective. It means “voluntary” or, oddly, “spontaneous”.  What Christians say God gave us is “Free Will”.  In other words, the ability to be free with our will. Of all the problems I have with religion, I think this is the part I have the least trouble with.  But the above graphic says “In the Bible God only gave us the ability to choose what we want to do (will), but not the freedom to act upon those choices.” This makes no sense. The Bible says we are free to exercise our will. Which part of “free will” stops you from “acting upon those choices”?  The reality, for both Believers and non-believers, is that there are consequences to your actions.  Christianity dreams up all sorts of scary shit to keep Believers in line, but there’s nothing in Christianity that forces Believers to be a certain way—they just scare you into it.  That’s still free will since it is your choice to do something that will result in punishment.
“Adultery” does not mean “having sex with a person who is married to another.”  I’ll paraphrase the correct definition and say that adultery is having sex with someone other than one’s spouse.  As for the part where Jesus says adultery and lust are the same thing, I think, from a certain point of view, that’s an accurate statement.  The idea is to keep all of your love for your spouse and when you feel amorous toward someone who isn’t your spouse without acting on those feelings, in a way, you’re cheating.  Of course, you’re also giving into your genetics, which aren’t really programmed for monogamy, so whatever.
“Love” is the second of two words that is properly defined by this graphic.  Though it is incomplete.  The complete definition is “strong affection for another arising out of kinship or personal ties.”  It is standard Christian propaganda to say that God has a personal relationship with all of us and that “He” “loves” us.  This is obviously not true since there is no God.  However, this is not an example of Christians misusing words.  They say that “God is love” because they are good at marketing.
Wow, I’m really starting to wonder about my fellow atheists.  When you make up a whole graphic that claims to describe how Christians misuse certain words, you might want to consult a dictionary, first.
Seriously, this stupid graphic is one of the most moronic things I’ve read in weeks—and I’ve been reading a lot about Rick Perry, so that’s saying something!

I agree with the sentiment of this “Words that Christians Misuse” but I think this graphic utterly full of crap.

“Study” saying what they really do at “Bible Study” is really “Bible Worship” is semantics. Most people who study something usually revere that thing or else they wouldn’t be studying it.  You might as well call Neil deGrasse Tyson a “Science Worshipper” (and you’d be accurate).

“Truth” this is NOT the “conformity with fact or reality.”  I’m not sure where this definition even comes from.  Merriam-Webster defines truth as the following (important part emboldened/italicized by me):

a archaic : fidelityconstancyb : sincerity in action, character, and utterance 2(1) : the state of being the case : fact (2) : the body of real things, events, and facts : actuality (3) often capitalizeda transcendent fundamental or spiritual reality b : a judgment, proposition, or idea that is true or accepted as true <truths of thermodynamics >c : the body of true statements and propositions3a : the property (as of a statement) of being in accord with fact or reality b chiefly British : true 2c : fidelity to an original or to a standard 4capitalized Christian Science : god— in truth: in accordance with fact : actually

So, in other words, one of the official definitions of the truth fits pretty much with the way Christians use it.  Sad that language, itself, seems to be biased toward religion.  But again, Christians aren’t really misusing the word “truth.”

“Morality” is NOT what causes the least amount of harm to others.  That’s the most absurd definition of “morality” I’ve ever read.  Morality is doing what is right (though it’s definition is more involved than just that). Sometimes we define “right” as doing more harm for the greater good.  Like going to war, or killing in self-defense, or euthanasia.  Morality is a big fat gray zone of debate since so often the very definition of what is “right” changes based on one’s mood.  So, if you believe what God says is right and someone tells you God said that it’s OK to slaughter the Canaanites, then wiping out all of the people of Canaan is a moral thing to do.

“Freewill” is not a word.  Well, not a noun, anyway.  It’s an adjective. It means “voluntary” or, oddly, “spontaneous”.  What Christians say God gave us is “Free Will”.  In other words, the ability to be free with our will. Of all the problems I have with religion, I think this is the part I have the least trouble with.  But the above graphic says “In the Bible God only gave us the ability to choose what we want to do (will), but not the freedom to act upon those choices.” This makes no sense. The Bible says we are free to exercise our will. Which part of “free will” stops you from “acting upon those choices”?  The reality, for both Believers and non-believers, is that there are consequences to your actions.  Christianity dreams up all sorts of scary shit to keep Believers in line, but there’s nothing in Christianity that forces Believers to be a certain way—they just scare you into it.  That’s still free will since it is your choice to do something that will result in punishment.

“Adultery” does not mean “having sex with a person who is married to another.”  I’ll paraphrase the correct definition and say that adultery is having sex with someone other than one’s spouse.  As for the part where Jesus says adultery and lust are the same thing, I think, from a certain point of view, that’s an accurate statement.  The idea is to keep all of your love for your spouse and when you feel amorous toward someone who isn’t your spouse without acting on those feelings, in a way, you’re cheating.  Of course, you’re also giving into your genetics, which aren’t really programmed for monogamy, so whatever.

“Love” is the second of two words that is properly defined by this graphic.  Though it is incomplete.  The complete definition is “strong affection for another arising out of kinship or personal ties.”  It is standard Christian propaganda to say that God has a personal relationship with all of us and that “He” “loves” us.  This is obviously not true since there is no God.  However, this is not an example of Christians misusing words.  They say that “God is love” because they are good at marketing.

Wow, I’m really starting to wonder about my fellow atheists.  When you make up a whole graphic that claims to describe how Christians misuse certain words, you might want to consult a dictionary, first.

Seriously, this stupid graphic is one of the most moronic things I’ve read in weeks—and I’ve been reading a lot about Rick Perry, so that’s saying something!


Posted by thepete on Saturday, October 1st at 12:25 PM. [link]

The next time someone talks about Obama’s Birth Certificate, ask if Jesus had one.

I CAN’T BELIEVE I didn’t think of this sooner.  

A bunch of years ago, I saw a fun little docu called “The God that Wasn’t There.”  It basically sets out to debunk that Jesus was a real person and it does a pretty good job.  Memories of that movie always come back to me whenever I see people refer to Jesus as a person who really existed.  I just saw someone quoting a witness to the recent execution of Troy Davis as saying ”Jesus was killed on the cross not because he was guilty, but because we all were.”

My first thought was: “He was a fictional character.  He was only fictionally killed on the cross.  There’s no proof he ever really lived, no birth certificate… HEEEEYYYY!!!”

It’s a weird day.


Posted by thepete on Tuesday, September 27th at 6:15 PM. [link]

thereisnogod:

christiannightmares:

Christian heckler calls Obama the Antichrist (For a related post, click here http://christiannightmares.tumblr.com/post/995097248/tea-party-sign-the-antichrist-is-living-in-the)

Fuck your god.

While I didn’t hear in there the specific accusation that Obama is the anti-Christ, I’d like to just come out and say it:

I’m anti-Christ.

…But I’m not THE anti-Christ.  I feel that while some of his alleged teachings sound great, I think you’d be better off reading the words of Superman or Spider-Man to look for wisdom.  They’re just as reality-based as Jesus, in fact, I think modern super-heroes are more relavant than some ancient super-hero who fictionally lived 2000 years ago. 

It’s sort of like when people tell me I’m going to go to hell or that I won’t get into heaven both because I’m an atheist.  I usually respond “Ok, I guess.”

“But aren’t you afraid?”

“Um, of something that doesn’t appear to exist? No.”


Posted by thepete on Wednesday, May 18th at 1:21 PM. [link]

thereisnogod reports:

ONLY 3 DAYS TILL THE RETURN OF MY LORD AND SAVOR!

Are you prepared? Listen to this week&#8217;s 666cast and get tips on what to do at your Rapture Party!

thereisnogod reports:

ONLY 3 DAYS TILL THE RETURN OF MY LORD AND SAVOR!

Are you prepared? Listen to this week’s 666cast and get tips on what to do at your Rapture Party!


Posted by thepete on Thursday, July 15th at 4:33 PM. [link]

Guns for Gods (via ColbertReport.com)

Saw this on last Thursday’s ep of Colbert Report and knew I had to cap it and post it.  Great stuff :)


Posted by thepete on Tuesday, July 6th at 12:06 PM. [link]

contrararian:

If you don’t sin, Jesus died for nothing
(via sjswa2179)

Luckily, it&#8217;s easy to sin in the eyes of the Church.

contrararian:

If you don’t sin, Jesus died for nothing

(via sjswa2179)

Luckily, it’s easy to sin in the eyes of the Church.


Leave a message at
740 297 6661
and get on the 666cast
About:

The idea is that all of human society is based on a power structure that enslaves the trusting/ignorant and rewards the greedy and the dishonest. From government, to business to our individual lives, all of our actions are tailored to further support a system that exploits all of us and wastes our lives in the process. Website666.com endeavors to explain how. Shape-shifting lizards aren't running the world, but they might as well be. Only a sociopath would think they deserve to run things.

-ThePete,
webmaster website666.com,
effyou.org, dntlk.com, and thepete.com